[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks
From: |
Richard Braun |
Subject: |
Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:27:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 02:22:51PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Well, then it can be done by something else than the proc server, it
> does not really matter much. What matters is that we don't want to let
> user tasks leak tasks without some control.
In my opinion, since tasks are kernel objects, task grouping should be
done by the kernel too. For me, it looks like this issue is part of
the more general problem of resource accounting in Mach.
--
Richard Braun
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, (continued)
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Richard Braun, 2013/09/12
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Samuel Thibault, 2013/09/12
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Richard Braun, 2013/09/12
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Samuel Thibault, 2013/09/15
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Richard Braun, 2013/09/15
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Richard Braun, 2013/09/16
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/16
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Samuel Thibault, 2013/09/16
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Ludovic Courtès, 2013/09/16
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Samuel Thibault, 2013/09/16
- Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks,
Richard Braun <=
Re: Hacking gnumach to track parental relationship of tasks, Neal H. Walfield, 2013/09/06