[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2)
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2) |
|
Date: |
Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:24:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Wed 16 Oct 2013 07:44:11 +0200, a écrit :
> What about being paranoid, and do the check on both the transmit _and_
> receive side?
There is no need for a check on the transmit side: the sender does know
for sure what he is.
Samuel
- RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2),
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Svante Signell, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/16
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support 1(2), Samuel Thibault, 2013/10/16