[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filen

From: Zhang Cong
Subject: Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff]
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 20:42:04 +0800

On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
Again, no.  Drivers can work the way they prefer.  The driver
infrastructure itself doesn't need a "bigplan", it is parts of it which
need their own.  For instance, the IRQ issue I mentioned has its plan
by itself, and it doesn't need to interfere with the physical memory
allocation issue.
That's not sure,  unless we have a plenty of driver works, we may need adjust the infrastructure for the need or some new abstract .
Although we have driver infrastructure, no enough third part driver provider now. 
The audio driver and video driver may be part of hurd at first ( just on repo's view), at least some high level abstract, this need a plan.

Cong Zhang 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]