bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/6] libmachdev: fix device_open


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] libmachdev: fix device_open
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 01:39:12 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)

Justus Winter, le Sun 13 Apr 2014 13:43:09 +0200, a écrit :
> device_open used to explicitly call ds_device_open_reply instead of
> just letting the mig-generated wrapper around ds_device_open generate
> the return message.  There is really no need for that.

Ack.

> * libmachdev/net.c: Do not include device_reply_U.h.
> (device_open): Do not call ds_device_open_reply.
> Set *devicePoly to MACH_MSG_TYPE_MAKE_SEND.
> ---
>  libmachdev/ds_routines.c |  1 -
>  libmachdev/net.c         | 13 ++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libmachdev/ds_routines.c b/libmachdev/ds_routines.c
> index 0e431a3..44f1139 100644
> --- a/libmachdev/ds_routines.c
> +++ b/libmachdev/ds_routines.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,6 @@
>  
>  #include "vm_param.h"
>  #include "device_S.h"
> -#include "device_reply_U.h"
>  #include "io_req.h"
>  #include "dev_hdr.h"
>  #include "util.h"
> diff --git a/libmachdev/net.c b/libmachdev/net.c
> index 501c9bb..300d946 100644
> --- a/libmachdev/net.c
> +++ b/libmachdev/net.c
> @@ -368,15 +368,14 @@ device_open (mach_port_t reply_port, 
> mach_msg_type_name_t reply_port_type,
>           dev->set_multicast_list (dev);
>  #endif
>       }
> -      if (MACH_PORT_VALID (reply_port))
> -     ds_device_open_reply (reply_port, reply_port_type,
> -                           err, dev_to_port (nd));
> -      return MIG_NO_REPLY;
>      }
>  
> -  *devp = ports_get_right (nd);
> -  *devicePoly = MACH_MSG_TYPE_COPY_SEND;
> -  return D_SUCCESS;
> +  if (nd)
> +    {
> +      *devp = ports_get_right (nd);
> +      *devicePoly = MACH_MSG_TYPE_MAKE_SEND;
> +    }
> +  return err;
>  }
>  
>  static io_return_t
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

-- 
Samuel
"c'est pas nous qui sommes à la rue, c'est la rue qui est à nous"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]