[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chroot in its own ext2fs?
|
From: |
Michael Banck |
|
Subject: |
Re: chroot in its own ext2fs? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 May 2014 10:06:38 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Hi,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 02:22:01AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Does anybody remember precisely why chroots should have their own
> ext2fs? I can build packages fine from inside a chroot which doesn't
> have its own ext2fs, for instance.
I don't recall why we did that, maybe it was purely for operational
reasons (offline filesystem checking of just the chroot when still had
lots of corruption) and is no longer applicable today.
Michael