Re: GDB testsuite: »Memory at address 0 is possibly executable«

[Richard Braun]

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 01:39:05AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> So it seems we need what is not actually documented, i.e. a vm_map
> with anywhere=1, but which takes into account the suggested address.
> I'm fine with officially supporting that, we just need to fix the
> documentation, and fix all places which weren't aware of this behavior
> (there are very few). Do we agree on this?

Personally, I do prefer this approach, since that's how mmap is expected
to behave (with the interesting addition that, if MAP_FIXED isn't set,
but the hint is non-zero, the returned mapping must not start at
address 0).

-- 
Richard Braun