bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shortest path to significant improvement in hardware support


From: Olaf Buddenhagen
Subject: Re: Shortest path to significant improvement in hardware support
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:08:37 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:31:01AM -0300, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote:

> From that perspective I'm looking for the most straightforward way to
> get hardware working on Hurd
[...]
> After some thought I came to the conclusion that the way to achieve
> these requirements is to patch core libraries like libusb to use
> librump directly, analogously to what Robert Millan did originally for
> mplayer and sound support.

I don't think that's a viable approach for most use cases: it requires
all applications using any of the Rump drivers to run with full hardware
access. That's like MS DOS -- the exact opposite of a microkernel
architecture :-)

While theoretically there are ways to avoid that (see exokernel), that
would require considerably *more* changes than running Rump instances as
Hurd servers.

-antrik-



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]