[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:57:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 12 Oct 2015 14:49:43 +0200, a écrit :
> Your proposed change does not meet what I said.
> Notably, in the nn->openmodes = O_READ and newmodes = O_WRITE case,
> it'll be wrong: nn->openmodes & newmodes will be zero, and thus the
> 'file' port will be used as such, but it will not have O_WRITE mode!
> Subsequent writes to the file will then fail (and if they don't, that's
> another bug to be fixed).
Grmbl, I actually meant: in the nn->openmodes = O_WRITE and newmodes =
O_READ case.
Samuel
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/11
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/11
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/15