[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:49:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Tue 13 Oct 2015 13:42:22 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > I believe they will. But perhaps in your tests they didn't (but did
> > your tests really try that?), in which case it'd mean there is a bug.
> > But for now nothing said there was a bug there.
>
> FYI: gcc-snapshot (20150817, not 20150913) and frama-c (20150201+sodium
> +dfsg-2) with downgraded dependencies (probably an FTBFS issue if
> rebuilt on other arches) build fine with the latest fakeroot :)
I've seen that on buildds, yes, but snd & such still have an issue with
temporary files in /tmp
Samuel
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, (continued)
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/11
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/15
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/12
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Svante Signell, 2015/10/13
- Re: RFC: [PATCH] trans/fakeroot.c, Samuel Thibault, 2015/10/15