[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:22:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Thomas Schwinge, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 12:02:36 +0100, wrote:
> > I couldn't figure out any pattern from looking at the diffs between the
> > respective Hurd packages' sources.
I've digged a bit, the difference that matters between -2 and -3
is about the protected payload optimization. -2 used to disable it
because we had issues with pflocal. -3 fixed the pflocal issue and thus
re-enabled the optimization.
So apparently there is at least another issue with it.
Samuel
- Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Thomas Schwinge, 2016/02/23
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Thomas Schwinge, 2016/02/23
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Samuel Thibault, 2016/02/23
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Justus Winter, 2016/02/23
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Samuel Thibault, 2016/02/23
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Justus Winter, 2016/02/23
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Samuel Thibault, 2016/02/23
- Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Samuel Thibault, 2016/02/23
Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV, Justus Winter, 2016/02/23