[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach
|
From: |
Richard Braun |
|
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:32:35 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:05:19PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Agustina Arzille, on Sun 28 Feb 2016 18:52:26 -0300, wrote:
> > programs (At least, I hope it isn't), but I think it serves to illustrate
> > the performance of each implementation under heavy contention.
>
> I don't think there is heavy contention actually :)
I agree. That's the point of futexes.
--
Richard Braun
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach, Richard Braun, 2016/02/28
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach, Richard Braun, 2016/02/28
Re: RFC: Lightweight synchronization mechanism for gnumach, Samuel Thibault, 2016/02/28