Re: C++ vs. glibc/Hurd/Mach headers

[Samuel Thibault]

Samuel Thibault, on Sun 27 Nov 2016 17:14:26 +0100, wrote:
> >     In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:35:0,
> >                      from <stdin>:1:
> >     /usr/include/hurd.h: In function ‘int __hurd_fail(error_t)’:
> >     /usr/include/hurd.h:60:13: error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to 
> > ‘error_t {aka __error_t_codes}’ [-fpermissive]
> >            err = EIEIO;
> >                  ^
> >     /usr/include/hurd.h:64:13: error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to 
> > ‘error_t {aka __error_t_codes}’ [-fpermissive]
> >            err = ENOMEM;
> >                  ^
> >     /usr/include/hurd.h:68:13: error: invalid conversion from ‘int’ to 
> > ‘error_t {aka __error_t_codes}’ [-fpermissive]
> >            err = EINVAL;
> 
> The HURD_MSGPORT_RPC seems missing casts between kern_error and error_t
> indeed.

Although the problem is actually that you passed 0 instead of ESUCCESS,
but it'd be very inconvenient to have to pass ESUCCESS. So I have
commited the cast.

Samuel