[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Personal Introduction

From: Brent W. Baccala
Subject: Re: Personal Introduction
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 20:17:59 -0400

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
Brent W. Baccala, le jeu. 05 avril 2018 19:06:23 -0400, a ecrit:

Yes, Mach is
sort of an exception, because it was merely the ground for the whole
kernel.  But being BSD-licenced, it was not posing problems for future

Well, Mach is what we're talking about now, and if being BSD-licensed doesn't pose a problem, then why should my contributions be a problem if they're GPL-licensed?

Please make a decision about the 169 line patch I attached to my earlier email.  You can use it under the GPL, and I'm even willing to assign copyright on it to the FSF.  But it's not going to be "all past and future work" on Hurd, or gnumach, or anything else.

I think Charlie Sale deserves some clear guidance on whether or not he can base a new tracing facility on that patch.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]