>From 49d128d0b0d85870014d84c2d5aa163de37b0272 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joshua Branson Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 10:45:59 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] On the Old Hurd FAQ, I removed the line "Alternatively," you may use a BSD style ufs. ext2 seems to be the best tested partition type. --- faq/old_faq.txt | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/faq/old_faq.txt b/faq/old_faq.txt index 7946062e..5df82276 100644 --- a/faq/old_faq.txt +++ b/faq/old_faq.txt @@ -42,10 +42,9 @@ license is included in the file COPYRIGHT. ?? What partition type should I use for my GNU/Hurd partitions? -{MB} You should use an ext2 filesystem. Alternatively, you may use BSD -style ufs. The partition type number for ext2fs is 0x83 (this is the -same as in Linux), not 0x63 (GNU HURD). Thomas explains why 0x63 is the -wrong choice: +{MB} You should use an ext2 filesystem. The partition type number +for ext2fs is 0x83 (this is the same as in Linux), not 0x63 (GNU HURD). +Thomas explains why 0x63 is the wrong choice: One day we may have a new filesystem format, which would probably be called the GNU Hurd filesystem format, and might -- 2.19.2