[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 22:43:51 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

I'm fine with using proxies if that happens to be optimized.

But I'm sad seeing FIXME, XXX, etc. in various places that people don't
take the time to implement, and they work around them.

This week-end, I at last managed to get rid of the horrible rmh
kludge in glibc that hurt us several times, and was there only
because nobody took the time to implement gnumach's 10-line-longish

Here, possibly proxies can indeed work properly. But please do look at
what Joan's situation is to make sure it does.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]