[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping
From: |
Joan Lledó |
Subject: |
Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Aug 2021 20:14:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 |
Hi,
El 16/8/21 a les 20:16, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
Ok but I meant that the device_map interface already has has an "offset"
Ok, now I got it, yes I think that's better. I'll do that.
Actually I'm thinking that this is just another case of mremap().
I need help on this part, why is mremap relevant here?
The underlying question is getting the memory object of a given memory
range, like vm_region does.
Yes, I see that could be useful. Is vm_region not workig for proxies?
> We need to be careful since we don't want any process to be able to
> get the memory object of any other process
Is that not being checked yet? can I call vm_region to get another
task's memory object now?
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, (continued)
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/16
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Samuel Thibault, 2021/08/16
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/16
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Samuel Thibault, 2021/08/16
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/16
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Samuel Thibault, 2021/08/16
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/08/17
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/17
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/08/18
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/18
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping,
Joan Lledó <=
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/17
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Joan Lledó, 2021/08/18
- Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Sergey Bugaev, 2021/08/18
Re: PCI arbiter memory mapping, Samuel Thibault, 2021/08/09