bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH htl v3 2/5] htl: Move thread table to ld.so


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [PATCH htl v3 2/5] htl: Move thread table to ld.so
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 01:27:00 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

Hello,

Sergey Bugaev, le mar. 07 sept. 2021 16:33:22 +0300, a ecrit:
> diff --git a/htl/Versions b/htl/Versions
> index 4aea321016..4e0ebac285 100644
> --- a/htl/Versions
> +++ b/htl/Versions
> @@ -132,25 +122,25 @@ __pthread_alloc (struct __pthread **pthread)
>      }
>  
>  retry:
> -  __pthread_rwlock_wrlock (&__pthread_threads_lock);
> +  lll_lock (GL (dl_pthread_threads_lock), LLL_PRIVATE);

Please rather use __libc_rwlock_wrlock etc.
Even if for now they are actually locks and not rwlocks, the day we fix
that the rwlocking of dl_pthread_threads_lock will get fixed alongside.

> -  /* Store a pointer to this thread in the thread ID lookup table.  We
> -     could use __thread_setid, however, we only lock for reading as no
> -     other thread should be using this entry (we also assume that the
> -     store is atomic).  */
> -  __pthread_rwlock_rdlock (&__pthread_threads_lock);
> -  __pthread_threads[pthread->thread - 1] = pthread;
> -  __pthread_rwlock_unlock (&__pthread_threads_lock);
> +  /* Store a pointer to this thread in the thread ID lookup table.  */
> +  __pthread_setid (pthread->thread, pthread);

We still want to optimize for read-lock.

Apart from this it looks good, thanks!

Samuel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]