[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH] remove pth issue

From: Guy-Fleury Iteriteka
Subject: [PATCH] remove pth issue
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 22:01:05 +0200

 open_issues/pth.mdwn | 28 ----------------------------
 1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 open_issues/pth.mdwn

diff --git a/open_issues/pth.mdwn b/open_issues/pth.mdwn
deleted file mode 100644
index 12bf509..0000000
--- a/open_issues/pth.mdwn
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation,
-[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
-id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
-document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or
-any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant
-Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license
-is included in the section entitled
-[[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
-[[!tag open_issue_porting]]
-IRC, unknown channel, unknown date.
-    <azeem> seems pth still doesn't work
-    <bddebian> Doesn't build or doesn't work?
-    <azeem> both
-    <azeem> some configure test keep grinding the CPU, same for the test suite
-    <azeem> which apparently runs pth_init() and never returns
-    <azeem> actually, pth fails to build right now
-    <azeem> pth_mctx.c:477: error: request for member '__pc' in something not 
a structure or union
-    <azeem> I know the pth test suite fails (it locks up the machine) or used 
to fail, so I guess porting work for pth would be needed
-    <azeem> < marcusb> from reading the pth/PORTING document, porting libpth 
shouldn't be too hard...
-    <youpi> dropped pth [from the channel's topic], as we think we know why it 
fails (sigaltstack is bogus)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]