[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 64bit startup

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: 64bit startup
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:43:02 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

jbranso@dismail.de, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 03:40:16 +0000, a ecrit:
> >> lol... <https://harmful.cat-v.org/software/GCC> and
> > 
> > Exactly. So what?
> > 
> > Some folks have witty humor and appreciate the nostalgia. Others don't.
> > 
> > If you don't like my posts, then plonk me.
> > 
> > Jeff
> I followed the link, and I did think it was a little funny. Perhaps
> it was a little off topic. Or maybe GCC is partly at fault for the
> Hurd's X86_64 building troubles?

It's not at all. Nor is libtool.

I occasionally had issues in ./configure, too.

You'll say that's "yeah, it's all about auto-crap". No.

It's *very* most probably about bash, simply.

(and while the gcc page makes sense (all very complex software have
a lot of bugs, so compilers have, but the message has to be terribly
moderated, considering the huge amount of tests that gcc receives), the
auto-hell page doesn't: nowhere was it ever suggested that it's normal
for software to run several ./configure instances).

So, yes, it was essentially off-topic.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]