[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing
From: |
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:13:47 +0530 |
>> Secondly, is it possible for add_history to be in libreadline.so
>> instead of libhistory.so on GNU systems? Or in other terms why should
>> we check for add_history in both libreadline _and_ libhistory?
> I don't see why it would help to test for add_history in libreadline.
http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg52955.html tells
me that OpenBSD has add_history in libreadline instead of libhistory.
Do we want to use OpenBSD's libreadline or just stick to GNU's?
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
--
GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7
Key server: pgp.mit.edu
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing,
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/01
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/02
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/02
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/03
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/05
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/05
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05