[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Delegations for whois servers.
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Delegations for whois servers. |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Apr 2020 17:36:21 -0400 |
Hello there,
the recent revision of network delegations I recently undertook
in a commit, only rather large address chunks were updated. Now I
learned about ERX, Early Registration Transfer, where the first
few years of this century witnessed a large scale splitting,
and ensuing transfer to new authorities, of the old B-class
and C-class IP-ranges. I was made aware of this matter for APNIC.
I need advice as to the desirability to implement these in our
file `whois/ip_del_list'. It would mean entering a lot of 16-bit
ranges down to 24-bit ranges, shattered rather arbitrarily over
the old classes. Clearly, this would improve the usability of
our WHOIS client, but also increase its size due to hardcoded
delegation data. I noticed the issue when my client included in
OpenIndiana provided me with more relevant answers than did our client.
What is the size increase in rough numbers? I'm not sure it is worth
to worry about it unless we are talking about several thousands of
kilobytes.
Another question: The client found in Solaris offers a program
switch directing the query to Route Arbiter Database (whois.radb.net)
where large amounts of information on numeric networks are
easily available. Would you welcome a similar addition to
our client?
If you think it is useful, I see why not. I can't really say I use
whois that much to have a good grasp on what would be a useful feature
or not.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Delegations for whois servers.,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=