[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: link-2.test

From: Gary V . Vaughan
Subject: Re: link-2.test
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 23:30:01 +0100

On Monday 02 July 2001  4:34 pm, Golubev I. N. wrote:
> > It is the lo2o sed script that performs the filtering.
> It is run only if `test "$build_old_libs" = yes', and
> `build_old_libs=no' in my config.  Should we for such a
> configurations:
> skip the test,
> cause `check' makefile rules to ensure `build_old_libs=yes' in a
> `libtool' specially created for this test,
> or change `ltmain.in' to run "$lo2o" regardless of "$build_old_libs"?

OIC.  It is certainly a bug for libtool not to do lo2o filtering if static 
builds have been turned off for some reason, but on the other hand I think 
the test would be more robust if we ran it in one of the demo directories 
rather than using the installer's libtool build.  I'll accept patches to fix 
either/both of these...

  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan     gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist  http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk        ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker          http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool   \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author        http://sources.redhat.com/autobook    =`---d__/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]