bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

.la file parsing too simple for cross compiling


From: Michael Taht
Subject: .la file parsing too simple for cross compiling
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 14:23:07 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010917

We generate one set of libraries for use on both the cross compile target and host system(s).
for example, mips libs go in:

/opt/hardhat/devkit/mips/fp_le/target/usr/lib

The problem arises when we have (for example) a libglib.la file in that subdir, you get a libdir=/usr/lib/ line in that file. This works fine for doing native development later - but for cross development it forces link lines such as:

/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link mips_fp_le-gcc -O2 -o libIDL.la -rpath /opt/hardhat/devkit/mips/fp_le/target/usr/lib -version-info 4:4:4 -release 0.6 parser.lo lexer.lo ns.lo util.lo -L/opt/hardhat/devkit/mips/fp_le/target/usr/lib -lglib

to be transformed into:

mips_fp_le-gcc -shared parser.lo lexer.lo ns.lo util.lo -L/opt/hardhat/devkit/mips/fp_le/target/usr/lib /usr/lib/libglib.so -Wl,-soname -Wl,libIDL-0.6.so.0 -o .libs/libIDL-0.6.so.0.4.4

which tries to link /usr/lib/libglib.so into the cross compile target.

Is there a way to suppress the -l expansion? Or could a future version of libtool use some sort of prefix variable in declaring libdir in the .la files? Or some other solution?







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]