bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BUG: library type search order


From: Gary V . Vaughan
Subject: Re: BUG: library type search order
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:39:58 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Scott!

On 24 Mar 2004, at 14:01, Scott James Remnant wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 11:38, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:

On 24 Mar 2004, at 02:08, Scott James Remnant wrote:
I've also decided that the lack of an rpath is actually right for
non-libtool libraries, we should only hardcode paths of libtool
libraries because we have more control over those.

Hmmm... I'm not so sure.

Read this thread and see if you change your mind :-)

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/1999/debian-devel-199902/
msg00033.html

Oh, I agree with RPATHing in general; I'm just not sure that we have all
the information when linking to a non-Libtool library:

        $ libtool --mode=link gcc -o test test.lo \
                -L/somewhere/lib -lfoo

I see what you mean now.  Agreed.

Cheers,
        Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFAZWgeFRMICSmD1gYRAtxbAKCDZRuREkN4pTrMjgPKTcdIHnl8IQCfcog4
vHaJoygNa/oISaj0DNHDWj0=
=WSI0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]