[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Darwin status

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: Darwin status
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 17:42:07 +0100

Le 4 déc. 04, à 17:00, Peter O'Gorman a écrit :

The archive contains 3 identically named files (hw.o) and support for this is currently broken on darwin.

I did a little research.
It has never worked on darwin, making it work is going to be hard. I really would go rename those files :(


I have something that works (seems to work?) now, but I
don't know what's different.

Actually, what's the problem exactly?  In the tarball I
send, the binary works, it is the swig'ed scrypt that
fails.  In fact, if the lib made in the top level is
lib_ instead of noinst_, everything works.

That's fine for me.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]