[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Solaris & libtool (continued)

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Solaris & libtool (continued)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:55:01 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Hi there,

* Пухальский Юрий Андреевич wrote on Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:02:46PM CET:
> So, I've checked libtool on Solaris 9 and Solaris 10.
> Solaris 9, libtool 1.5.14 built with gcc passes all tests (make check).


> Solaris 9, libtool 1.5.14 built with Sun Studio compiler (cc 5.5) fails. 
> (sol9.log)
> Solaris 10, libtool 1.5.14 built with Sun Studio compiler (cc 5.6) fails. 
> (sol10.log)
> Thus we observe at least a regression from 1.5.10 (this is the version
> I use now for building my project).

Yes, I have identified one regression, but there is at least another
one, maybe two.

Please try the attached patch, it should fix at least the mdemo*

f77demo failures: Please show the output of f77demo/config.log.

tagdemo failures: 
Please, after running these tests again, go into tests/tagdemo, execute
the link line which libtool issues ("CC -G -zdefs...") with `-v' added.

Please show output of
  libtool --tag=CXX --config
What happens if you issue the link line manually "CC -G -zdefs.."
and leave out the "-nolib"?

Please add "-dryrun" to see which libraries are added.

The quote.test failure sucks.  Why does it choose /bin/sh over bash on
Solaris 9 but not on Solaris 10 (this is not a real question, rather thinking
out loud)?

Thank you for your patience,

>       * libtool.m4 (AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_LD_SHLIBS) [solaris]: Use ${wlarc}
>       and set to empty when using $LD for linking.
>       Reported by Ralf Menzel <address@hidden>.

Attachment: solaris-wlarc
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]