bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

FYI: [libtool 2.1a] testsuite: 5 9 15 failed


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: FYI: [libtool 2.1a] testsuite: 5 9 15 failed
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:00:04 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 08:05:21AM CEST:
> * Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 11:07:49PM CEST:
> >
> > It is valid Java (having been a former contributor to the jikes compiler
> > for Java), although naming a method A when the class is named A is
> > not normal practice (if you intended for those to be constructors, get
> > rid of the void keyword in [ABC].java). 
*snip*

FYI: I have applied this patch to HEAD.

Regards,
Ralf

>         * tests/convenience.at <GCJ>: Fix java test.
>         Reported by Eric Blake <address@hidden>.
> 
> Index: tests/convenience.at
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/tests/convenience.at,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -r1.1 convenience.at
> --- tests/convenience.at      27 Apr 2005 18:19:07 -0000      1.1
> +++ tests/convenience.at      25 Jun 2005 05:30:49 -0000
> @@ -119,19 +119,19 @@
>  AT_DATA([A.java],
>  [[public class A {
>    private int a;
> -  public void A () { a = 0; }
> +  public A () { a = 0; }
>  };
>  ]])
>  AT_DATA([B.java],
>  [[public class B {
>    private int b;
> -  public void B () { b = 0; }
> +  public B () { b = 0; }
>  };
>  ]])
>  AT_DATA([C.java],
>  [[public class C {
>    private int c;
> -  public void C () { c = 0; }
> +  public C () { c = 0; }
>  };
>  ]])
>  AT_DATA(foo.java,




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]