[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake/libtool question
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: automake/libtool question |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2006 13:11:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-09-01) |
[ Cc:ing both lists; let's drop the automake list ]
Hello David,
* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST:
>
> HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
> automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06)
> For the installed, libtool-created libraries, I am use "-L/some/path"
> in foo_LDFLAGS when linking foo, but I seem to need to use both
> "-L/some/path" _and_ "-R/some/path" when linking foo with installed
> non-libtool-created libraries.
Yes, I think this is intended, although I admit that the documentation
doesn't reveal this. (Old old convention.)
> Libtool is creating a script that wrappers the non-installed foo, and
> sets the LD_LIBRARY_PATH accordingly _except_ that there is no
> reference to the installed non-libtool-created library paths.
Are you speaking about the case with -R/some/path or without?
If with, then why does it not work out of the box, i.e., without
having to amend LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
(I don't deny that there could be a bug; if there is, then we should add
a test case to expose it, and fix it.)
Cheers,
Ralf