bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Libtool fails to build working binary when -no-install is used


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Libtool fails to build working binary when -no-install is used
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:20:52 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-03-22)

Hi Simon,

Thanks for the bug report.

* Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:17:32PM CEST:
>
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -DLIBSSH2_DARWIN -I/ 
> usr/include -I/usr/include -no-install -L/usr/lib -lcrypto -L/usr/lib  
> -lz -o simple simple.o ../src/libssh2.la
> mkdir .libs
> gcc -DLIBSSH2_DARWIN -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -o simple  
> simple.o  -L/usr/lib ../src/.libs/libssh2.dylib -lcrypto -lz
> make  check-TESTS
> dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libssh2.1.dylib
>    Referenced from: /Users/daniel/Desktop/libssh2/tests/./simple
>    Reason: image not found
> FAIL: simple

Looks like a Darwin-related (hint, hint! ;-) bug to me.

Note to self: expose -no-install in testsuite ((also) in stresstest.at
as optional additional flag to `main' and `dlself').  No wonder it
doesn't work: it's not covered in the testsuite.  :-/

I think you should be able to work around it by adding
  -R ../src

to the link flags for `simple' (untested, please try it!  self: also put
in testsuite), that should be more efficient than dropping -no-install
and thus having the wrapper everywhere.  Please also note that on w32
you'll get (a warning and) a wrapper regardless, as there's no way to
hardcode there.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]