Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-libtool (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Thu Mar 27 2008 13:56:50 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• March 27, 2008
  • Re: libtool 1.5.26: link fails on Darwin 5.5 because of wrong detection of -single_module flag support, Peter O'Gorman, 13:56
  • Re: libtool 1.5.26: link fails on Darwin 5.5 because of wrong detection of -single_module flag support, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:26
• March 26, 2008
  • Re: libtool 1.5.26: link fails on Darwin 5.5 because of wrong detection of -single_module flag support, Peter O'Gorman, 22:56
• March 24, 2008
  • What semantics should -R have for libs? (was: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed), Ralf Wildenhues, 16:47
  • Re: Fix disable-static -all-static, Ralf Wildenhues, 10:30
  • Re: Fix disable-static -all-static (was: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed), Bob Friesenhahn, 10:20
  • Re: Fix disable-static -all-static, Nix, 09:42
  • Fix disable-static -all-static (was: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed), Ralf Wildenhues, 08:43
  • Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Nix, 08:29
  • Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 08:20
  • Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Nix, 08:17
  • Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:57
  • Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Nix, 07:39
  • Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 05:56
• March 22, 2008
  • Re: [libtool] libtool-2.2 and NetBSD 1.6 IA-32 and GNU m4-1.10, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:54
  • Re: LIBTOOL_DEPS wrong when AC_CANONICAL_BUILD not called before initializing libtool, Jakub Bogusz, 08:36
• March 21, 2008
  • testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Nix, 22:40
  • [libtool] libtool-2.2 and NetBSD 1.6 IA-32 and GNU m4-1.10, Nelson H. F. Beebe, 18:29
• March 20, 2008
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Eric Blake, 15:58
  • DESTDIR can not be relative, Ilya N. Golubev, 15:49
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 15:18
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Ralf Wildenhues, 15:12
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:58
• March 19, 2008
  • Re: shared libraries and runtime linking on aix >= 4.2, Michael Haubenwallner, 10:03
  • Re: libtool 2.2 and updating aclocal.m4, Olly Betts, 06:47
  • Re: shared libraries and runtime linking on aix >= 4.2, Peter O'Gorman, 02:03
• March 18, 2008
  • libtool 2.2 and updating aclocal.m4, Olly Betts, 23:25
  • Re: MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, George Bosilca, 15:52
  • Re: MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:09
  • shared libraries and runtime linking on aix >= 4.2, Michael Haubenwallner, 13:12
  • Re: MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, Peter O'Gorman, 11:58
  • Re: MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 11:16
  • Re: MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, George Bosilca, 10:07
  • Re: MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:48
  • Re: MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, Peter O'Gorman, 01:41
  • MAC OS X, static compilation and libtool, George Bosilca, 00:28
• March 17, 2008
  • Re: [1.5.26] new test using 'make install DESTDIR=...', Ralf Wildenhues, 17:11
  • Re: [1.5.26] new test using 'make install DESTDIR=...', Michael Haubenwallner, 12:50
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Jeff Squyres, 11:17
  • Re: [1.5.26] new test using 'make install DESTDIR=...', Michael Haubenwallner, 04:50
• March 15, 2008
  • Re: LIBTOOL_DEPS wrong when AC_CANONICAL_BUILD not called before initializing libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 18:01
  • Re: [1.5.26] new test using 'make install DESTDIR=...', Ralf Wildenhues, 13:36
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Ralf Wildenhues, 10:02
  • Re: LIBTOOL_DEPS wrong when AC_CANONICAL_BUILD not called before initializing libtool, Jakub Bogusz, 09:58
  • Re: LIBTOOL_DEPS wrong when AC_CANONICAL_BUILD not called before initializing libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:38
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Jeff Squyres, 08:13
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Jeff Squyres, 08:07
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Jeff Squyres, 07:52
• March 14, 2008
  • LIBTOOL_DEPS wrong when AC_CANONICAL_BUILD not called before initializing libtool, Jakub Bogusz, 23:07
  • Re: libtool 2.2 - import library detection failure when cross compiling to mingw32, Jakub Bogusz, 23:07
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Ralf Wildenhues, 22:35
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Ralf Wildenhues, 22:29
  • Re: Possible problem with LT 2.2, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:55
  • Possible problem with LT 2.2, Jeff Squyres, 19:36
  • [1.5.26] new test using 'make install DESTDIR=...', Michael Haubenwallner, 12:54
• March 13, 2008
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 20:39
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 10:38
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Ralf Wildenhues, 02:30
  • Re: libtool 2.2 - import library detection failure when cross compiling to mingw32, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:02
• March 12, 2008
  • libtool 2.2 - import library detection failure when cross compiling to mingw32, Jakub Bogusz, 21:09
  • Re: [patch #6416] AmigaOS4 support in libtool, Henning Nielsen Lund, 16:00
  • Re: [patch #6416] AmigaOS4 support in libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:48
• March 11, 2008
  • Re: [patch #6416] AmigaOS4 support in libtool, Henning Nielsen Lund, 18:23
  • Re: [patch #6416] AmigaOS4 support in libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:34
• March 10, 2008
  • Re: libtool --mode=execute with -L parameter, a v2.2 regression, Simon Josefsson, 10:07
  • Re: libtool --mode=execute with -L parameter, a v2.2 regression, Peter Rosin, 09:53
  • libtool --mode=execute with -L parameter, a v2.2 regression, Simon Josefsson, 09:10
• March 09, 2008
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 40 41 42 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 failed, snowcrash+libtool, 23:19
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 40 41 42 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 failed, Peter O'Gorman, 22:44
  • Re: cross compilation to w32, Roumen Petrov, 18:49
  • Re: cross compilation to w32, Roumen Petrov, 18:15
  • Re: [patch] 1.5.26 do echo=echo if necessary, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 12:58
  • Re: cross compilation to w32, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:07
  • Re: cross compilation to w32, Roumen Petrov, 12:01
  • Re: libtool runs compiler command in wrong locale, Ralf Wildenhues, 10:12
  • Re: [patch] 1.5.26 do echo=echo if necessary, Ralf Wildenhues, 10:08
  • Re: [patch] 1.5.26 do echo=echo if necessary, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 10:05
• March 08, 2008
  • Re: [patch] 1.5.26 do echo=echo if necessary, Peter O'Gorman, 18:33
  • Re: [patch] 1.5.26 do echo=echo if necessary, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 15:05
  • Re: cross compilation to w32, Charles Wilson, 14:42
  • [patch] 1.5.26 do echo=echo if necessary, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 14:42
  • Re: cross compilation to w32, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:17
  • Re: cross compilation to w32, Gary V. Vaughan, 11:39
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 55 failed with as-needed, Alexis Ballier, 10:37
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 55 failed with as-needed, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:07
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 55 failed with as-needed, Alexis Ballier, 08:50
  • cross compilation to w32, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:03
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Roberto Bagnara, 05:54
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 04:11
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Roberto Bagnara, 03:58
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:31
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Roberto Bagnara, 02:27
• March 07, 2008
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 17:11
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 14:42
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Bob Friesenhahn, 14:17
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 14:11
  • Re: mode=execute argument munging bug, Roberto Bagnara, 07:50
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 04:10
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32], Ralf Wildenhues, 02:55
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 02:40
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [Solaris AMD64], Peter O'Gorman, 01:45
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 01:10
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 01:09
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Gary V. Vaughan, 01:07
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 00:42
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 00:39
• March 06, 2008
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 21:45
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Gary V. Vaughan, 21:11
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Bob Friesenhahn, 21:09
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 20:04
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 17:28
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Gary V. Vaughan, 17:07
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 16:52
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Gary V. Vaughan, 16:42
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 15:03
  • compiler found but not functional (was: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53) 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 15:03
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Peter O'Gorman, 14:58
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 14:55
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 14:50
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 14:43
  • Re: libtool runs compiler command in wrong locale, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:42
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Peter O'Gorman, 14:37
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 14:29
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 14:12
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 14:10
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [Solaris AMD64], Ralf Wildenhues, 14:03
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Gary V. Vaughan, 09:49
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 02:06
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 01:49
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:47
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 01:36
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux AMD64], Peter O'Gorman, 01:20
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux Alpha], Peter O'Gorman, 01:10
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 12 17 19 38 64 failed [Mac OS X Intel], Peter O'Gorman, 01:07
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 23 49 60 61 64 failed [OSF/1 Alpha], Peter O'Gorman, 01:00
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 00:49
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Peter O'Gorman, 00:47
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [Solaris AMD64], Peter O'Gorman, 00:36
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 00:32
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 00:32
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 00:28
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Peter O'Gorman, 00:18
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 00:13
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [Solaris IA-32], Peter O'Gorman, 00:10
• March 05, 2008
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [Solaris IA-32], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux IA-32], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [Solaris AMD64], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 33 34 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 57 58 60 61 62 failed [NetBSD IA-32], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 23 49 60 61 64 failed [OSF/1 Alpha], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux AMD64], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 12 17 19 38 64 failed [Mac OS X Intel], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 64 failed [GNU/Linux Alpha], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 23:33
  • Re: mode=execute argument munging bug, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:14
  • Re: mode=execute argument munging bug, Roberto Bagnara, 01:38
• March 04, 2008
  • mode=execute argument munging bug (was: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed), Ralf Wildenhues, 16:26
  • libtool generated by "GNU $PACKAGE" (was: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed), Ralf Wildenhues, 16:14
  • Re: libltdl memory corruption, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:04
  • Re: Another powerpc64 biarch problem., Peter O'Gorman, 10:56
  • Re: Another powerpc64 biarch problem., Steven Munroe, 10:41
  • Re: libltdl memory corruption, Peter O'Gorman, 01:15
• March 03, 2008
  • Re: libltdl memory corruption, Peter O'Gorman, 18:08
  • Re: libltdl memory corruption, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:54
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Roberto Bagnara, 15:15
  • libltdl memory corruption, Andreas Schwab, 09:39
• March 02, 2008
  • Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:43
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 40 41 42 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 failed, snowcrash+libtool, 15:16
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 40 41 42 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 failed, snowcrash+libtool, 14:30
  • Re: 'demo' not included in 2.2, Sylvain Beucler, 11:48
  • Re: 'demo' not included in 2.2, Gary V. Vaughan, 11:41
  • 'demo' not included in 2.2, Sylvain Beucler, 11:02
  • Re: GNU Libtool 2.2 and the future ("Saturday, March 1st 2009, 22:22:22"), Ralf Wildenhues, 08:11
  • GNU Libtool 2.2 and the future ("Saturday, March 1st 2009, 22:22:22"), Jens Schleusener, 08:08
  • Re: Can't build Win32 DLL that links with static libraries, Ralf Wildenhues, 04:23
  • [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 34 failed, Roberto Bagnara, 02:48
• March 01, 2008
  • Can't build Win32 DLL that links with static libraries, Neil Roberts, 22:04
  • Re: Another powerpc64 biarch problem., Peter O'Gorman, 10:40
  • Another powerpc64 biarch problem., Steven Munroe, 08:17

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc