[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 6
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC] |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:36:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:28:10AM CET:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>> Your gcj and automake are broken. Do you have a sane toolchain on any of
>> your systems?
>
> That sounds a little harsh. I think that the LZMA complaint from
> automake may be because libtool requests a lzma package and it requires
> the very latest automake to do so.
Where does Libtool 2.2 require lzma? That would be a serious bug,
requiring such a recent Automake.
Thanks,
Ralf
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/06