[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Mar 2008 13:20:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Nix wrote on Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 01:16:59PM CET:
> On 24 Mar 2008, Ralf Wildenhues spake thusly:
> >
> > make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x -k runpath
> > LDFLAGS=-Wc,-specs=specs.no-as-needed'
>
> Ooo, you can pass LDFLAGS inside TESTSUITEFLAGS! Neat.
>
> ... nonetheless, that gets transformed into -Wl, which, as stated, is
> not useful:
Oops, sorry. Try
make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x -k runpath LDFLAGS="-Xcompiler
-specs=specs.no-as-needed"'
> > (all on one line). And yes, `-Wc,' exists as both a documented compiler
> > flag (for which this particular instance is _not_ useful), and as a
>
> Not in my compiler, nor in any upstream snapshot I've checked
> (admittedly my upstream snapshot is a month or so out of date: perhaps
> it's been added since then?)
Hmm, maybe that was for a compiler other than GCC. Hmm, dunno,
but doesn't really matter, either.
Cheers,
Ralf
- testsuite: 24 25 64 failed, Nix, 2008/03/21
- Fix disable-static -all-static (was: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/24
- Re: Fix disable-static -all-static, Nix, 2008/03/24
- Re: Fix disable-static -all-static, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/24
- Re: Fix disable-static -all-static (was: testsuite: 24 25 64 failed), Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/24