[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Failure to link with libtdl

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Failure to link with libtdl
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 23:19:50 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

Hi Bob,

* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:18:12AM CEST:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
>>> I advised him to add the --with-included-ltdl option and then it 
>>> worked. This caused me to suspect that our tests for a suitable 
>>> already installed libltdl may be faulty.
>> The log you sent indicates that ImageMagick built and linked the 
>> included libltdlc.la, which in turn was missing argz.o which would have 
>> satisfied the symbols that were flagged unresolved.
> Yes, I realized this after my email posting, but the question to be  
> resolved is why.  I am not able to reproduce the issue here under OS-X  
> Leopard with the PATH set to default and non-existing prefix.

The original bug reporter is the one who should be able to help.
You are the one to solve this as you can communicate with him
(or "remote-control him", if you prefer to call it that).

> Libtool developers are the last people who should be testing anything  
> related to autotools since our systems are already nicely fortified with 
> perfect software.

Rather, there are more than just a few possible combinations.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]