[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: finish mode needed for plugins?
From: |
Stefan Kost |
Subject: |
Re: finish mode needed for plugins? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:15:41 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080922) |
hi,
Bob Friesenhahn schrieb:
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Stefan Kost wrote:
>> That is good news indeed. Unfortunately that will probably only hold for
>> multiple modules that come from one directory. I am working in the
>> gstreamer
>> project - we have several hundreds on modules and each has a single
>> build directory.
>
> It seems that this should be a wake-up call to convert your modules
> build scheme to a non-recursive build (at least for the modules). The
> improvement in build and install times will be dramatic.
>
Sorry, but I think we should fix/improve the tools instead of sacrificing a
clean build tree.
Stefan
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Stefan Kost, 2008/10/22
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/22
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Stefan Kost, 2008/10/22
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/22
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Stefan Kost, 2008/10/23
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/23
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/23
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Stefan Kost, 2008/10/24
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/10/24
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?,
Stefan Kost <=
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/26
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Stefan Kost, 2008/10/27
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/10/27
- Re: finish mode needed for plugins?, Stefan Kost, 2008/10/27