[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shared lib requires main ?!
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: shared lib requires main ?! |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Nov 2008 16:50:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hello Gabriel,
please keep the list in Cc:, thanks.
* salsaman wrote on Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 04:20:18PM CET:
> This is off-topic for the bug, but please can you give me one more tip if
> possible; the local libraries are created as e.g.
> libfoo.la
>
> Depending on the particular build directory, I would like the real libs to
> be just:
> foo
>
> or
>
> foo.wo
>
> Using automake, do you know if this is possible ?
With libraries named libfoo.la, there will be a libfoo.so after
installation. If you want to avoid the 'lib' prefix: that is only
portable for modules, but not for libraries (and libtool strongly
encourages portable naming). Modules are denoted with the -module
link flag, so you'd use something like
pkglib_LTLIBRARIES = foo.la
foo_la_LDFLAGS = -module
and most often, -avoid-version is used for modules, too.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Ralf