[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: link-order.at test set wrong -L?

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: link-order.at test set wrong -L?
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 19:32:08 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Hi Kurt,

* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 06:23:50PM CET:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:56:00AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > 
> > Can you expand a bit?  Are you seeing this test fail anywhere, and if
> > yes, can you post the verbose log of the failure, including all details
> > such as compiler/linker used, system this happens on etc.?  If no, I
> > guess you are questioning the validity of the test?
> I'm questioning the validity of the test.  I'm working on something
> that resulted in the rpaths being in reversed order and that
> caused the test to fail.  And I see no reason why there should
> be an rpath to the old lib.  And the only reason I can see
> the rpath is being set is the -L on the command line.

Well, show what you have, without worrying much about this particular
test for now, and we will see then.  This test has always been one of
the weaker ones (and originally intended to only check for a pretty
small detail), but we're still lacking a better replacement, and/or
more general testsuite exposure here.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]