bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libtool 2.2.6] testsuite: 74 failed


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [libtool 2.2.6] testsuite: 74 failed
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:32:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Hello Peter, Graham,

* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:48:00PM CET:
> Graham Alvare wrote:
> > There's a bug in my libtool, I'm using an almost stock OSX 10.4.11 on an
> > iMac Core2Duo

> > Mac OS X tests
> > 
> >  74: darwin fat compile                              FAILED (darwin.at:93)
> 
> > ld: flag: -undefined dynamic_lookup can't be used with 
> > MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET environment variable set to: 10.1
> > /usr/bin/libtool: internal link edit command failed
> > lipo: can't figure out the architecture type of: /var/tmp//cclOHQL8.out
> > stdout:
> > libtool: link: (cd 
> > /SourceCache/libtool-2.2.6/tests/testsuite.dir/74/.libs/libbar.lax/libfoo.a/unfat-13699/libfoo.a-ppc
> >  && ar x "libfoo.a")
> > libtool: link: (cd 
> > /SourceCache/libtool-2.2.6/tests/testsuite.dir/74/.libs/libbar.lax/libfoo.a/unfat-13699/libfoo.a-i386
> >  && ar x "libfoo.a")
> > libtool: link: gcc -dynamiclib -Wl,-undefined -Wl,dynamic_lookup -o 
> > .libs/libbar.0.dylib  .libs/bar.o   .libs/libbar.lax/libfoo.a/baz.o 
> > .libs/libbar.lax/libfoo.a/foo.o    -arch ppc -arch i386   -install_name  
> > /nonexistent/libbar.0.dylib -compatibility_version 1 -current_version 1.0 
> > -Wl,-single_module
> > ./darwin.at:93: exit code was 1, expected 0
> > 74. darwin.at:26: 74. darwin fat compile (darwin.at:26): FAILED 
> > (darwin.at:93)
> 
> Thanks for this, your libtool is fine, but there is a bug in the
> testsuite. The test should either skip in this case, or set
> MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET.

Any chance you could suggest a patch?

> By the way, whenever you build with libtool on ppc Mac OS X < 10.5, you
> should set the environment variable MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=$OS_VERSION
>  unless you are targetting an earlier OS than you are building on.

Should this be mentioned more explicitly in doc/notes.texi, too?

Thanks!
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]