[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFA: libtool.m4

From: Kai Tietz
Subject: Re: RFA: libtool.m4
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:01:04 +0200

2009/5/15 Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden>:
> Hello Kai,
> * Kai Tietz wrote on Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:46:49AM CEST:
>> 2009/5/1 Charles Wilson:
>> > Cross-compilation environments involving windows variants (mingw32,
>> > 64bit mingw, cygwin, etc) and libtool are a little flaky at the moment.
>> > I've had a number of patches to address (some of) this but they've been
>> > unreviewed for almost six months.  If we can get the ball rolling on
>> > that, they *should* be easy to extend to 64bit mingw by someone with
>> > access to a w64 system.
>> as JonY said, we have x64 windows machines and we are willing to test
>> your patches. Could you provide to us a link to your patches, so we
>> could verify for you. We can back post then the result of the test to
>> this ML or to you directly.
>> Ralf, is this a way for you?
> Surely feedback is helpful.
> I'm not sure whether it's clear to y'all here, but quite a big part of
> the concerns over the code in the pr-msvc-support branch is not just
> about regressions for other w32-related systems, but also for completely
> w32 unrelated systems.  Admittedly I don't remember whether that was the
> case for the patches Charles mentioned.
> Cheers,
> Ralf

Hi Ralf,

it would be good to see those patches and possible a mark to those
concerns. I would be real happy if we finally could make those patches
for libtool, so that for gcc the w64 can build shared libstdc++
version. There are bugs within none-shared libstdc++ in string class
(reasoned by lazy initialization IIUC), which can be solved by the
shared version.


|  (\_/) This is Bunny. Copy and paste
| (='.'=) Bunny into your signature to help
| (")_(") him gain world domination

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]