bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5


From: Peter O'Gorman
Subject: Re: 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 17:17:13 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4

On 06/06/2010 04:05 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:


Do we really want to test this with no object files?


I think the workaround we used at the time for compilers like this was
to empty whole_archive_flag_spec, although cheaper workaround could in
principle be used (add dummy object, extract only the first convenience
archive).  It bothers me to see that GCC reintroduces this bug, however.


Ugh, well, I am not going to remove the -force_load support from libtool, it's the best way to get debugging working with convenience archives. I'll look at adding a dummy object if there is no other object on the link line (but I don't think it's urgent for an OS that does not ship with an affected compiler).

Looks like gfortran has always done this, but on linux --whole-archive foo.a --no-whole-archive does not need to be -Wl, quoted, so gfortran sees the foo.a and counts it as an input file. I'll ask on the gcc list about this later.

I have a patch for gcj that appears to work, waiting to ensure it doesn't cause regressions before posting it to gcc-patches.

On another topic - do we care about test failures that only happen with SElinux in enforcing mode (at least tests/demo-exec.test fails on Fedora 13)?

Thanks,
Peter



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]