[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.
From: |
Piotr Juźwiak |
Subject: |
Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:17:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
On Tuesday 15 of June 2010 23:53:18 you wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Yes, errors like this are due to the missing support for -
flto in
> > Libtool.
> >
> > I started a patch series for fixing Libtool:
> >
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10794/focus=10808
> > >
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/9767>
> > but so far, only one of the four patches got merged.
Some still
> > needs further work, some still need review.
> >
> > For example, my fellow maintainers could review these:
> >
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10794/focus=9769>
> >
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.general/10810>
>
> Enough time has passed that you could simply commit
these patches if
> you want to do so. I don't see anything sloppy about the
patches
> which would cause any concern. I doubt that any of us are
in a
> position to anticipate the full outcome from the patches.
The patches
> are not without a degree of risk, but it seems to me that
the demand
> for testing (particularly the $pic_flag patch) will not be
satisified
> unless the patches are in the mainline libtool code. The
urgency for a
> new libtool release has now abated so this is as good a time
as any to
> apply the patches so that proper testing can ensue.
>
> Bob
That would be VERY preferable since i wouldn't have to patch
them out of the main portage tree and would just use the SVN
version.