Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-libtool (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Jun 26 2010 06:49:46 -0400 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• mixed prefix libraries ..., Michael Meeks, 2010/06/26
  • Re: mixed prefix libraries ..., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/26
• Fwd: Re: library/6407: BUG: automake with no AUTOMAKE_VERSION has zero exit status, Ken Dickey, 2010/06/20
• bootstrap doesn't work on FreeBSD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
  • Re: bootstrap doesn't work on FreeBSD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/21
    • Re: bootstrap doesn't work on FreeBSD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/21
      • Re: bootstrap doesn't work on FreeBSD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/21
• libtool 2.2.8 build on OpenBSD 4.7 fails test suite, Ken Dickey, 2010/06/18
  • Re: libtool 2.2.8 build on OpenBSD 4.7 fails test suite, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/18
  • Re: libtool 2.2.8 build on OpenBSD 4.7 fails test suite, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
    • Re: libtool 2.2.8 build on OpenBSD 4.7 fails test suite, Ken Dickey, 2010/06/19
• [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Donald Parsons, 2010/06/17
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/17
    • Re: [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Donald Parsons, 2010/06/17
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/18
• Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0, Piotr Juźwiak, 2010/06/15
  • Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/15
    • Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0, Piotr Juźwiak, 2010/06/15
      • Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/15
    • Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/15
      • Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0, Piotr Juźwiak, 2010/06/15
      • Re: Compiling some packages fails when using -flto with the new gcc-4.5.0, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/22
• [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/11
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/12
    • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Peter Rosin, 2010/06/12
    • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/13
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/14
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/15
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/15
    • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/15
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/16
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/16
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/06/16
    • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/17
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/17
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Charles Wilson, 2010/06/19
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/19
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.11a] testsuite: 48 69 92 failed [cygwin], Peter Rosin, 2010/06/12
• [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 21 102 failed, Andreas Schwab, 2010/06/10
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 21 102 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/11
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 21 102 failed, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/11
    • Re: [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 21 102 failed, Andreas Schwab, 2010/06/11
      • Re: [libtool 2.2.10] testsuite: 21 102 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/11
• Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/10
  • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/10
    • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/10
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/10
    • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/10
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/10
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/11
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Dave Korn, 2010/06/11
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/11
    • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/12
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/12
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/13
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/13
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/13
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/14
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/22
      • Re: Multiple test failures with --disable-shared, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/23
• Requesting renewed contribution(s) to Linux Test Project, Subrata Modak, 2010/06/09
• [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 34 43 67 102 failed (OSF/1 5.1 (old)), Jay K, 2010/06/09
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 34 43 67 102 failed (OSF/1 5.1 (old)), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/09
• [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Warren Dodge, 2010/06/08
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/08
  • Re: [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/08
    • Re: [libtool 2.2.8] testsuite: 24 102 failed, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/09
• LT_AT_MAKE doesn't terminate the test on failure., Peter Rosin, 2010/06/08
  • Re: LT_AT_MAKE doesn't terminate the test on failure., Peter Rosin, 2010/06/08
    • Re: LT_AT_MAKE doesn't terminate the test on failure., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/08
      • Re: LT_AT_MAKE doesn't terminate the test on failure., Peter Rosin, 2010/06/08
  • Re: LT_AT_MAKE doesn't terminate the test on failure., Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/08
    • make dist failure (was: Re: LT_AT_MAKE doesn't terminate the test on failure.), Peter Rosin, 2010/06/08
      • Re: make dist failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/09
      • Re: make dist failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/06/09
      • Re: make dist failure, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/09
      • Re: make dist failure, Peter Rosin, 2010/06/09
• libtool-2.2.8 fails 3 tests on Haiku R1A2, scott mc, 2010/06/07
  • Re: libtool-2.2.8 fails 3 tests on Haiku R1A2, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/08
    • Re: libtool-2.2.8 fails 3 tests on Haiku R1A2, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/09
      • Re: libtool-2.2.8 fails 3 tests on Haiku R1A2, scott mc, 2010/06/09
• libtool-2.2.8 fails test 56 with --as-needed, Ryan Hill, 2010/06/06
  • Re: libtool-2.2.8 fails test 56 with --as-needed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/06
    • Re: libtool-2.2.8 fails test 56 with --as-needed, Ryan Hill, 2010/06/06
      • Re: libtool-2.2.8 fails test 56 with --as-needed, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/07
• 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/05
  • Re: 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/06
    • Re: 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/06
      • Re: 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/06/07
      • F13 SELinux failure (was: Re: 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5), Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/07
      • Re: F13 SELinux failure, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/07
      • Re: F13 SELinux failure, Peter O'Gorman, 2010/06/08
  • Re: 2.2.8 testsuite failures on mac os x 10.6.3 with gcc-4.5, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/06/06
• Re: Bug: linking shared libraries on Cygwin results in undefined references to __stack_chck_guard for code compiled with -fstack-protector, Cygwin/X, 2010/06/01
  • Re: Bug: linking shared libraries on Cygwin results in undefined references to __stack_chck_guard for code compiled with -fstack-protector, Cygwin/X, 2010/06/07

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc