bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libtool-2.2.11a on AIX 5.3 / 5.3 current git master - tests/mdemo-in


From: Rainer Tammer
Subject: Re: libtool-2.2.11a on AIX 5.3 / 5.3 current git master - tests/mdemo-inst.test 2./3. occurrence
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:51:41 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100701 SeaMonkey/2.0.6

Hello Ralf,
Hello Gary,

Gary: The whole thread can be found under:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2010-08/msg00007.html

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Rainer Tammer wrote on Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:34:12PM CEST:
>   
... cut for clarity ..

> -rwxr-xr-x    1 tammer   staff          6291 Aug 03 08:46 foo1.so
>   
>   
>> It looks like the umask is not honered..
>>     
> The mdemo tests are part of the old testsuite (for which the umask is
> not set) not the new testsuite; sorry for being imprecise.
>
>   
OK
> I'm still undecided on whether we should set that for the old testsuite,
> or go for the more general solution and just turn set o-rwx for *all*
> uninstalled libraries we generate on AIX, and only turn the bits on at
> `make install' time.  That way we would still require the umask in the
> testsuite, but developers of packages using libtool might be better off.
>
>   
That might be a good idea.
Maybe I can try to contact Garry R. Hook (IBM), he really knows this
stuff inside out.

Currently I am rerunning the test, this times it looks like the old test
suite is running OK.
I have no idea why..

So far i see:

$ genkld
    Text address     Size File
        d23dc000      7d6 tests/mdemo/.libs/foo1.so
        d11c1000      7a6 tests/mdemo/.libs/foo1.so
        d11be000      7d6 tests/mdemo/.libs/foo1.so

This is very strange...
> Thanks,
> Ralf
>
>
>   
Bye
  Rainer





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]