[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: static FORTRAN compilation set-up in libtool.m4

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: static FORTRAN compilation set-up in libtool.m4
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:01:00 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22)

Hello Juergen,

* Juergen Reuter wrote on Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:31:12PM CEST:
> concerning the flags for the static FORTRAN compilation we would 
> like to ask whether it would be possible to include also a setup for the NAG
> compiler. As we are using that compiler (versions 5.2, partially 5.1) on 
> 32bit  
> and 64bit Linux, we have added the corresponding part 
>      nagfor*)
>         # NAG Fortran compiler
>         _LT_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_wl, $1)='-Wl,-Wl,,'
>         _LT_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_pic, $1)='-pic'
>         _LT_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_static, $1)='-Bstatic'
>         ;;
> in libtool.m4 at line 4041 (version 2.2.10).

Thank you for the suggestion.  I found the compiler manual at
and I kind of wonder whether the -Wl,-Wl,, in your change is a typo.
Shouldn't it rather be
          _LT_TAGVAR(lt_prog_compiler_wl, $1)='-Wl,'


Also, I would like to ask you to submit test results for this compiler,
so that we know how well we support it.  If you have version 2.2.10,
please build and test like this:
  ./configure F77=nagfor FC=nagfor CC=gcc CXX=no GCJ=no
  make -k all check

and send all output, plus tests/testsuite.log, gzip'ed.  That way we can
also fix things that we see are lacking.  You might want or need to use
FC='nagfor -f95' or so.

If you are interested to help, some of the Fortran macros in Autoconf
could be improved for nagfor as well, trying to find it, and setting
some of the flags.  I can cook up a patch if you're willing to test it.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]