Re: break up functions

[Ingo Krabbe]

> 
> We have been taking some smaller steps here in the past, and I think
> that is a much more viable way than a massive breakup.  But anyway I'll
> be approving patches here only from contributors who then have the
> resources to fix regressions in the months afterwards.

Hi Ralf, 

actually I would take care of libtool a bit more, as I always ignored it
in the past, since it wasn't ever doing the things I wanted from it and
I never got a step into the code.

Now, it seems though, I found my way into reading that stuff.  If we are
talking about "months", and it will be ok, to have there one or two
months in between where I couldn't fix something, I would actually be
able to take care about libtool development and "fix regressions".  When
pointed to such bugs, that should be quite easy.

... and for the rest of the list readers ...

But still, what bothers me more, is what do you think about the
library/wrapper issue?  Do you see this problem, as I do, to be
critical?  And what should be the steps to get it corrected?

bye ingo