[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LT_PATH_NM uses too strict a check

From: Ximin Luo
Subject: Re: LT_PATH_NM uses too strict a check
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 22:34:43 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101030 Icedove/3.0.10

On 24/12/10 17:07, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> It seems to me that you should use parameters in CFLAGS to tell the
> compiler to produce code for the desired CPU sub-type rather than to
> invoke configure as if you were doing a cross-compilation.

isn't part of the point of libtool, to avoid doing this?

> Cross-compilation requires a toolset configured in a particular way.

i'm only "cross-compiling" to a different CPU variant. the base instruction
set, binary format, etc, everything else is the same.

what's wrong with the fix i suggested? it will cause the test to ignore
different instruction sets (eg. arm/x86) but this surely will be picked up



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]