Re: LT_PATH_NM uses too strict a check

[Ximin Luo]

On 24/12/10 17:07, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> It seems to me that you should use parameters in CFLAGS to tell the
> compiler to produce code for the desired CPU sub-type rather than to
> invoke configure as if you were doing a cross-compilation.

isn't part of the point of libtool, to avoid doing this?

> Cross-compilation requires a toolset configured in a particular way.
> 

i'm only "cross-compiling" to a different CPU variant. the base instruction
set, binary format, etc, everything else is the same.

what's wrong with the fix i suggested? it will cause the test to ignore
different instruction sets (eg. arm/x86) but this surely will be picked up
elsewhere?

X


-- 
GPG: 4096R/5FBBDBCE