bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LT_PATH_NM uses too strict a check


From: JonY
Subject: Re: LT_PATH_NM uses too strict a check
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 09:00:42 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/25/2010 21:46, Ximin Luo wrote:
> On 25/12/10 01:49, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>> What you are doing is not normal behavior.  A cross-compile is a build
>> in which the built binaries are not run on the build host and a
>> different set of build tools must be used.
>>
> 
> A lot of things aren't "normal behaviour", including cross-compiling in
> general. This is not a valid reason to dismiss my report. What's more, in my
> case, a "different set of build tools" is completely unnecessary. You would be
> using the *exact same tools* as in the non-cross-compile case.
> 

No, cross compile is very normal, its expected to work fine by just
setting the triplets, that is what autotools is great for. You are cross
compiling as long as host != build. Setting --host without setting
- --build is assumed to be cross compile.

What GMP is doing is not normal, the way it uses those triplets. IMHO
they should really be using --with-arch or some such to set the CPU insn
levels.

I suppose you want to set both --build and --host to be equal to each
other when doing GMP.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAk0Wk7oACgkQp56AKe10wHc4SgCdHuS45K68BW7G6bpf6MuhmASA
rOkAmgICfns+golMw4WRNAJ5Rfgz463L
=bjuR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: 0xED74C077.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]