[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint
From: |
Křištof Želechovski |
Subject: |
Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:42:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.34.7-0.7-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Dnia niedziela, 13 lutego 2011 o 08:25:16 Ralf Wildenhues napisał(a):
> Hello,
>
> * Křištof Želechovski wrote on Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:44:28PM CET:
> > Dnia piątek, 11 lutego 2011 o 18:02:41 Peter O'Gorman napisał(a):
> > > On 02/11/2011 10:52 AM, Křištof Želechovski wrote:
> > > > Dnia piątek, 11 lutego 2011 o 15:25:58 Peter O'Gorman napisał(a):
> > > >> Although lt__alloc.c contains a definition of lt__alloc_die
> > > >> (alloc_die_default) which does exit() on memory allocation failures,
> > > >> this definition is overridden with one that does not in lt_dlinit.
> > > >
> > > > Can this definition be removed?
> > >
> > > I don't see why.
> >
> > If there is a path that leads into the code calling exit, the warning is
> > valid.
> > If there is no such path, it can be safely removed.
>
> Presumably, there is a path that leads into the code calling exit, but
> only if ltdl was used outside of its spec (e.g., calling other functions
> before lt_dlinit). So, no, I don't think there are only two
> alternatives here.
>
> That said, I'm not sure if there are any users that require the current
> construction except when debugging code that uses ltdl. Anybody else?
How about a configure option to include the code on demand?
Chris
- warnings from openSuSE rpmlint, Křištof Želechovski, 2011/02/11
- Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint, Peter O'Gorman, 2011/02/11
- Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint, Peter O'Gorman, 2011/02/14
- Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint, Bob Friesenhahn, 2011/02/14
- Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint, Peter O'Gorman, 2011/02/14
- Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint, Křištof Želechovski, 2011/02/15