bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#19245: Compile warnings after updating to 2.4.4


From: Gary V. Vaughan
Subject: bug#19245: Compile warnings after updating to 2.4.4
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:00:07 +0000

> On Dec 4, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Michael Wobst <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Hey Gary (with one 'r') ;-)
> 
> I'm glad we finally figured it out. Thanks!
> 
> Greets,
> Michael
> 
> Gary V. Vaughan schrieb:
>> [[put bug-libtool and debbugs back in Cc:]]
>> 
>> Hi Michael,
>> 
>>> On Dec 4, 2014, at 1:45 PM, Michael Wobst <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Garry,
>> 
>> (Just the one 'r' in my name, please! :-)
>> 
>>> well, it's not just a cosmetical change from what I can see in 2.4.4's 
>>> libltdl/Makefile.am when compared to 2.4.3's libltdl/Makefile.am
>>> 
>>> I did a diff -urN to show you what I'm talking about:
>>> 
>>> #####################################################################
>>> --- trunk_2.4.3/libltdl/Makefile.am     2014-12-04 14:11:47.887496698 +0100
>>> +++ trunk_2.4.4/libltdl/Makefile.am     2014-12-04 14:11:09.087091542 +0100
>>> @@ -45,8 +45,9 @@
>>> # -I$(srcdir) is needed for user that built libltdl with a sub-Automake
>>> # (not as a sub-package!) using 'nostdinc':
>>> AM_CPPFLAGS           += -DLT_CONFIG_H='<$(LT_CONFIG_H)>' \
>>> -                         -DLTDL -I. -I$(srcdir) -Ilibltdl \
>>> -                         -I$(srcdir)/libltdl -I$(srcdir)/libltdl
>>> +                         -DLTDL -I. -I$(srcdir) \
>>> +                         -Ilibltdl  -I$(srcdir)/libltdl \
>>> +                         -Ilibltdl -I$(srcdir)/libltdl/libltdl
>>> 
>>> #####################################################################
>>> 
>>> Note the last line with the path being '$(srcdir)/libltdl/libltdl'.
>>> This doesn't appear in previous versions of libtool, but in 2.4.4
>> 
>> Ahah!  Agreed, and fixed in master (I'll push as soon as the testsuite
>> finishes); thanks for persevering with me.  While the change to ltdl.mk was
>> indeed cosmetic, I didn't account for the fact that during generation of
>> libltdl/Makefile.am multiple libltdl/libltdl on a single line of the source
>> file breaks the edit process.
>> 
>> Thanks again for your help in tracking down and fixing that bug.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]