[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lily 1.4.15
|
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
|
Subject: |
Re: lily 1.4.15 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jul 2002 10:26:03 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) |
Peter Chubb <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Han-Wen> 1.4.15 contains the latest fixes against crashes during
> Han-Wen> large-score-compilation, and a slew of fixes for the cygwin
> Han-Wen> target.
>
> Why does 1.4.15 depend on gcc version 2.8 (see configure.in)??? I
> have 2.95, 2.7.2 and 3.1 available.
It depends on gcc 2.8 or newer, and g++ 2.95 or newer. No need to
require a newer gcc.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- lily 1.4.15, Peter Chubb, 2002/07/01
- Re: lily 1.4.15,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Peter Chubb, 2002/07/02
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Message not available
- Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Wichert Akkerman, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/02