[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lily 1.4.15
|
From: |
Peter Chubb |
|
Subject: |
Re: lily 1.4.15 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jul 2002 18:56:05 +1000 |
>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
Jan> Peter Chubb <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>>>> "Han-Wen" == Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>>
Han-Wen> 1.4.15 contains the latest fixes against crashes during
Han-Wen> large-score-compilation, and a slew of fixes for the cygwin
Han-Wen> target.
>> Why does 1.4.15 depend on gcc version 2.8 (see configure.in)??? I
>> have 2.95, 2.7.2 and 3.1 available.
Jan> It depends on gcc 2.8 or newer, and g++ 2.95 or newer. No need
Jan> to require a newer gcc.
The configure script checks for exactly version 2.8
PeterC
- lily 1.4.15, Peter Chubb, 2002/07/01
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: lily 1.4.15,
Peter Chubb <=
- Re: lily 1.4.15, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Message not available
- Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Josip Rodin, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Wichert Akkerman, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/02
- Re: Unparsable gcc version string? [WAS: lily 1.4.15], Wichert Akkerman, 2002/07/02